|
Problem > Reaction > Solution is a term that
was coined recently in relation to the activities of the 'New World
Order'.
Put simply, in public relation terms,
Problem > Reaction > Solution is a technique used when trying to
sell something to the public, such as taking away freedoms, or
passing legislation's that under normal circumstances, the general
public would not agree to. It is a strong mechanism that has allowed
the Illuminati to operate and rule over us so easily.
For example. If say ten years ago, the then President of the USA
Bill Clinton gave a speech stating that he wanted more authoritarian
(stop and search) law, for no specific reason, most people would
stand up and say "Hang on a minute…….". So what is done is Problem >
Reaction > Solution.
Problem
They create a problem such as the Oklahoma bombing in 1995 in which
the Alfred P. Murrah building was provably destroyed unofficially
with the assistance of American government agencies and blamed on a
lone nutter by the name of Timothy McVeigh.
Reaction
There is an outrage. The public feels naked and afraid. This is
especially easy to do when the media (which they own) manipulates
the public's perception of the true version of events, causing the
public to say, something must be done.
Solution
More authoritarian law for the Government. BINGO!
Imagine this: If I was a self employed worker, who repaired car
windscreens for a living. I could make a bundle by using the
'Problem > Reaction > Solution' technique.
All that I would need to do is create a problem. I could sneak about
in the middle of the night and smash the windscreens of all of the
cars parked up and down my street. You can see where this is going.
There would be a reaction by the people on my street "Oh my god,
someone has smashed my windscreen!, I have to get to work, I must
get this fixed!" And the solution would be me getting a whole load
of business and no-one would be the wiser
A recent example of this technique is the pre-election Madrid
bombing of 11th March 2004. Just three days before the general
elections of Spain, this event which has caused a media frenzy has
also caused a surge of votes empowering the 'Socialist' movement.
Just like Hitler burned the Reichstag building as a pretext to his
agendas, events such as this, which are tragic are only pale
compared to the mass destruction that they can cause by consequence.
Coercing the masses through fear and by breaking the spirit of the
publics consciousness has proven successful in pushing through
agendas of the sinister.
Just watch this method be used within the next few years as it has
so far, when major cards will be played. Evil monsters will be set
up to have a finger to point at and subsequently will be
conveniently captured to justify the continuation of 'The War
Against Terror' (T.W.A.T), which will eventually lead to
centralization of power and a general Hitlerian dictatorship.
THINGS TO COME
In the same way that modern Hollywood movies are churning out
sequels which are faster paced and more action packed than their
predecessors to top the box office records, the events that we will
see throughout the next few years in terms of terrorist acts and
disasters will become much larger scale and more tragic than we have
seen so far.
CONCLUSION
I have no doubt that events such as 9/11, Oklahoma and the latest
Madrid bombing are carried out by the terrorist organizations which
the medias report. The main point to emphasize however is that it is
the organizations such as those within the US Bush Administration
and the Governments of Europe who set up and sponsored these events
that have ultimately benefited from them.
As I have said before, it aids law enforcement when solving a crime,
to look at who benefited from it and you usually find that this is
the person or persons who committed the crime. So why should this
not apply in world government?
I shall end this by quoting from the dictionary. I hope that this
gets across the point
Terrorism: n. The unlawful use or threatened use of force or
violence by a person or an organized group against people or
property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or
governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
Remember, no-one can walk over you unless you lay down and let them.
Source of article
|